Publications
Selected publications
- The Changing Dynamics of the Global Intellectual Property Legal Order: Emergence of a 'Network Agenda'? (Journal article - 2014)
- The Indian Supreme Court Ruling in Koushal v. Naz: Judicial Deference or Judicial Abdication? (Journal article - 2015)
- EU Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement: EU Microsoft Decision (Journal article - 2010)
- Potential Accession to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement: A Case-Study on India (Journal article - 2012)
- The Microsoft Decision: Setback to Intellectual Property Rights in Europe? (Journal article - 2010)
- Right to Commercial Speech in India: Construing Constitutional Provisions Harmoniously in Favor of Public Health (Journal article - 2022)
- Non-use and unreasonable use of federally funded technology protected by US patents (Journal article - 2010)
- Different rules for Different Owners: Does a Non-competing Patentee have a Right to Exclude (Journal article - 2008)
- Ebay Ruling and US Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement (Journal article - 2008)
- Patent Trolls in Thickets: Who is Fishing under the Bridge? (Journal article - 2008)
2022
Right to Commercial Speech in India: Construing Constitutional Provisions Harmoniously in Favor of Public Health
Subramanian, S., Gokani, N., & Aneja, K. (2022). Right to Commercial Speech in India: Construing Constitutional Provisions Harmoniously in Favor of Public Health. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 50(2), 284-290. doi:10.1017/jme.2022.53
2018
Notes from the frontier of the Sensor City
Savirimuthu, J., & Subramanian, S. (2018). Notes from the frontier of the Sensor City. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 32(2-3), 207-209. doi:10.1080/13600869.2018.1477500
2015
Review of Kshitij Singh's Bioechnology and Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Social Implications
Subramanian, S. (2015). Review of Kshitij Singh's Bioechnology and Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Social Implications. (2015) Indian Journal of International Law, 54.
The Indian Supreme Court Ruling in Koushal v. Naz: Judicial Deference or Judicial Abdication?
Subramanian, S. (2015). The Indian Supreme Court Ruling in Koushal v. Naz: Judicial Deference or Judicial Abdication?. George Washington International Law Review, 47(04), 711-762. Retrieved from https://www.gwilr.org/?page_id=1763
2014
Review of Kongolo's African Contributions in Shaping the Worldwide Intellectual Property System
Subramanian, S. (2014). Review of Kongolo's African Contributions in Shaping the Worldwide Intellectual Property System. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 22.
The Changing Dynamics of the Global Intellectual Property Legal Order: Emergence of a 'Network Agenda'?
Subramanian, S. (2015). The Changing Dynamics of the Global Intellectual Property Legal Order: Emergence of a 'Network Agenda'?. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 64(01), 103-139. doi:10.1017/S0020589314000426
Tshimanga Kongolo, <i>Africa's Contributions in Shaping the Worldwide Intellectual Property System</i>, Ashgate (2013)
Subramanian, S. (2014). Tshimanga Kongolo, <i>Africa's Contributions in Shaping the Worldwide Intellectual Property System</i>, Ashgate (2013). African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 22(2), 334-337. doi:10.3366/ajicl.2014.0095
2013
Indian Supreme Court's Departure from Judicial Activism (2013)
Subramanian, S. (2013). Indian Supreme Court's Departure from Judicial Activism (2013). Jurist.org.
Tinkering with the Law Won't Stop 'Patent Trolls (2013)
Subramanian, S. (2013). Tinkering with the Law Won't Stop 'Patent Trolls (2013). TheConversation.com.
2012
Potential Accession to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement: A Case-Study on India
Khorana, S., & Subramanian, S. (2012). Potential Accession to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement: A Case-Study on India. Journal of International Economic Law, 15(1), 287-309. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgs008
2010
Non-use and unreasonable use of federally funded technology protected by US patents
Subramanian, S. (2010). Non-use and unreasonable use of federally funded technology protected by US patents. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 5(12), 874-892. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpq141
EU Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement: EU Microsoft Decision
Subramanian, S. (2010). EU Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement: EU Microsoft Decision. European Journal of International Law, 21(4), 997-1023. doi:10.1093/ejil/chq075
The Microsoft decision: a setback to IP rights in Europe?
Subramanian, S. (2010). The Microsoft decision: a setback to IP rights in Europe?. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 5(4), 245-259. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpq009
The Microsoft Decision: Setback to Intellectual Property Rights in Europe?
Subramanian, S. (2010). The Microsoft Decision: Setback to Intellectual Property Rights in Europe?. (2010) 5 (4) Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 245 – 259.
2008
Different rules for Different Owners: Does a Non-competing Patentee have a Right to Exclude
Subramanian, S. (2008). Different rules for Different Owners: Does a Non-competing Patentee have a Right to Exclude. (2008) 39 (4) International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 419 - 450.
Different rules for different owners - Does a non-competing patentee have a right to exclude? A study of post-eBay cases
Subramanian, S. (2008). Different rules for different owners - Does a non-competing patentee have a right to exclude? A study of post-eBay cases. IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 39(4), 419-451.
Ebay Ruling and US Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement
Subramanian, S. (2008). Ebay Ruling and US Obligation to the TRIPS Agreement. (2008) 30 European Intellectual Property Review 444-453.
Patent Trolls in Thickets: Who is Fishing under the Bridge?
Subramanian, S. (2008). Patent Trolls in Thickets: Who is Fishing under the Bridge?. (2008) 30 (5) European Intellectual Property Review 182 - 188.
2007
'Does a Non-Competing Patentee Have a Right to Exclude?: A Study of Post-eBay Cases' (2007) ESRC CCP, Norwich (Policy Briefing)
Subramanian, S. (2007). 'Does a Non-Competing Patentee Have a Right to Exclude?: A Study of Post-eBay Cases' (2007) ESRC CCP, Norwich (Policy Briefing).