What difference does it make if the molecules are aimed not straight down onto
the surface, but at an angle ? This is the question we'll look at in this
section. When the molecules are aimed straight down we term this normal incidence, otherwise it's just
off-normal incidence.
We're really asking what effect does each of the two components of momentum
have, i.e. the momentum perpendicular to the surface, and the momentum parallel
to the surface.
In order to answer this, we need to introduce some terminology: It is customary
in gas-surface dynamics to discuss angular dependence in terms of "energies" and
energy scaling. So instead of
normal momentum, we would say normal
energy. In fact the normal energy is just the energy associated
with the normal component of momentum.
where M is the mass of the molecule.
By energy scaling we mean what is the
value of n such that
What these equations mean is that if you take the dissociation probability at
off-normal incidence and plot it not as a function of E, but as a
function of
E(n) instead, then it will lie exactly on top of the
normal incidence data, for
which E(n) = E anyway since the angle of
incidence is zero.
So, in other words, graphing dissociation/sticking probability versus normal
energy will cause all the points at whatever angles of incidence to collapse on
to one line, as shown in the example below.
Using Ep (note should be epsilon but the browser can't
support this) for the normal energy, it is easy to see from the figure that
where
Normal Energy Scaling
As an example, let's take n = 2 known as normal energy scaling, perhaps the most common
example.
This example shows what happens when the molecules are internally cold (unexcited) or hot (excited - in this case vibrationally), before they strike the surface.
Since normal energy scaling (NES) is so common, let's consider it
in more detail:
Dissociation on a corrugated PES.
Return to index. | Return to my homepage. | Comments to darling@ssci.liv.ac.uk |
©G.R. Darling