AHAH: short technical report (new version)

Published on

The index of ‘Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards’ (AHAH) is a relative measure of accessibility to health promoting aspects of small areas (Lower-layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) for England and Wales, and Data Zones for Scotland – hereby referred collectively as LSOAs) across Great Britain. The updated version of Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards index combines together indicators under four different domains of accessibility, detailed in the following sections:

 

  • Retail environment
  • Health services
  • Physical environment
  • Air Quality

 

Retail Environment Domain

 

The domain focused on measuring the accessibility to retail services where individuals could purchase healthy or unhealthy foods and drink (and gambling which is indirectly related to health outcomes). We calculated the following measures of accessibility (the median distance (km) by car travel route of postcodes within a LSOA to nearest outlet):

 

  • Fast food outlet
  • Gambling outlets
  • Pubs/bars/nightclubs
  • Off licenses
  • Tobacconists

 

Data on all retail businesses throughout Great Britain were provided by the Local Data Company (LDC). The data includes records for every operating retail business including a classification of retail type (e.g. fast food outlets, pubs, bars and nightclubs, bookmakers, casino clubs, off license, tobacconist) and the postcode of the store.

 

 

Health Services Domain

 

Geographic accessibility to health services has been demonstrated to be associated with utilization of services. We calculated accessibility (the median distance (km) by car travel route of postcodes within a LSOA to nearest service) to different health-related services including:

 

  • GP surgeries
  • A&E Hospitals
  • Pharmacies
  • Dentists
  • Leisure Centers

 

Openly available data from NHS Digital and Information Services Division (ISD) in NHS Scotland were used for GP surgeries, A&E hospitals, pharmacies and dentists. Leisure centers were acquired from the LDC data. 

 

 

Physical Environment Domain

 

We measure aspects of the physical environment such as access to blue and green spaces which have demonstrated consistent associations to health and health-related behaviours:  

 

  • Access to Blue Space (distance km to nearest)
  • Access to Green Space - Active (distance km to nearest)
  • Access to Green Space - Passive (total green space within a 900-meter buffer)

 

Open data from OS on Green spaces was used for preparing two variables related to the distance from the nearest green space (active) and the total green space areas available to each postcode in a range of a 900-meter buffer (passive). Blue space locations such as beaches were acquired from OpenStreetMap and the mainland water bodies (lakes, rivers) were retrieved from the European Settlement Map (ESM 2012) raster dataset at a 5 meters resolution.

 

 

Air Quality Domain

 

Features related to the air quality of environment have also been shown to influence health. Pollution is a major cause of ill health and is estimated to be responsible for about 8 million deaths every year globally according to the latest WHO reports (https://www.who.int/airpollution/en/). We measure aspects of the air quality which have demonstrated consistent associations to health and health-related behaviours:  

 

  • Level of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
  • Level of Particulate Matter (PM10)
  • Level of Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)

 

Open data from DEFRA on modelled air quality estimates was used for pollution variables.

 

 

Methods

 

Accessibility measures were created using the Routino open source tool. Routino is an application for finding a route between two points using the OSM road network and takes into account restrictions on roads as well as tagged speed limits and barriers. In this study, we measured the network distance (travel time) between the centroid of each postcode in Great Britain and the coordinates of the nearest service (e.g. postcode centroid of GP practice).

 

Measured network distances for each indicator for postcodes were aggregated to the LSOA level providing average network distances for each indicator (as a measure of accessibility). All other indicators were also summarised for LSOAs. The indicators within each domain were standardised by ranking and transformed to the standard normal distribution. The direction of each variable was dictated by the literature (e.g. accessibility to fast food outlets were identified as health negating, whereas accessibility to GP practices was health promoting see Table 1).

 

To calculate our overall index (and domain specific values), we followed the methodology of the 2015 IMD (Smith et al., 2015). For each domain, we ranked each domain R and any LSOA scaled to the range [0,1]. R=1/N for the most ‘health promoting’ LSOA and R=N/N for the least promoting, where N is the number of LSOAs in Great Britain. Exponential transformation of the ranked domain scores was then applied to LSOA values to reduce ‘cancellation effects’ (Smith et al., 2015). So, for example, high levels of accessibility in one domain are not completely cancelled out by low levels of accessibility in a different domain. The exponential transformation applied also puts more emphasis on the LSOAs at the end of the health demoting side of the distribution and so facilitates identification of the neighbourhoods with the worst health promoting aspects. The exponential transformed indicator score X is given by:

 

X = -23 ln (1 – R(1 – exp(-100 / 23)))

 

where ‘ln’ denotes natural logarithm and ‘exp’ the exponential transformation.

 

The main domains across our indicators: retail services, health services, physical environment and air qualitythen were combined to form an overall ‘Index of Access to Healthy Assets and Hazards’ (AHAH). 

 

 

References

 

Smith T., Noble M., Noble S., Wright G., McLennan D., Plunkett E. 2015. The English Indices of Deprivation 2015, Department for Communities and Local Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015-technical-report [Accessed 10 Dec 2016]