If women ran the world: Evidence that female office-holders de-escalate cross-party hostility in western democracies - James F. Adams
4:00pm - 5:30pm /
Thursday 4th March 2021
- Dr Luca Bernadi
- Admission: This is a free event, however, please register via the Eventbrite link provided
- Book now
Add this event to my calendar
Click on "Create a calendar file" and your browser will download a .ics file for this event.
Microsoft Outlook: Download the file, double-click it to open it in Outlook, then click on "Save & Close" to save it to your calendar. If that doesn't work go into Outlook, click on the File tab, then on Open & Export, then Open Calendar. Select your .ics file then click on "Save & Close".
Google Calendar: download the file, then go into your calendar. On the left where it says "Other calendars" click on the arrow icon and then click on Import calendar. Click on Browse and select the .ics file, then click on Import.
Apple Calendar: The file may open automatically with an option to save it to your calendar. If not, download the file, then you can either drag it to Calendar or import the file by going to File >Import > Import and choosing the .ics file.
Concerns over mass-level contempt and hostility across party lines – what scholars label affective polarization – have intensified in recent years across Western democracies. While scholars link this phenomenon to policy disputes, economic conditions, and political institutions, no extant study asks whether women’s presence in elected office influences affective polarization. We present theoretical arguments that women’s presence in parties’ parliamentary delegations defuses dislike among their partisan opponents, and we evaluate this claim by empirically analyzing an original dataset on women’s presence in party parliamentary delegations in 20 western democracies, combined with Comparative Study of Electoral Systems survey data on partisans’ affective ratings of parties. Our analyses confirm that, indeed, partisans express warmer feelings toward out-parties with higher proportions of female MPs (all else equal), but that this effect dissipates as parties’ MP delegations approach gender parity. Our findings have implications for parties’ election strategies and for affective polarization.
Bio: Jim Adams is a Professor of Political Science at the University of California at Davis. He studies voting behavior, parties' election strategies, and mass-elite linkages in Western democracies. His work encompasses spatial models of party competition, and empirical analyses of parties' policy programs and of election outcomes. His research has appeared in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, and the British Journal of Political Science. His recent book from Cambridge University Press, American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective (2020, with Noam Gidron and Will Horne), analyzes the intensity and the causes of cross-party hostility across 20 Western publics.
Bio: Jim Adams is a Professor of Political Science at the University of California at Davis. He studies voting behavior, parties' election strategies, and mass-elite linkages in Western democracies. His work encompasses spatial models of party competition, and empirical analyses of parties' policy programs and of election outcomes. His research has appeared in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal of Political Science, and the British Journal of Political Science. His recent book from Cambridge University Press, American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective (2020, with Noam Gidron and Will Horne), analyzes the intensity and the causes of cross-party hostility across 20 Western publics.