Recent developments of fair and equitable treatment in international investment law
- Marketing, Recruitment and Events Team
- Suitable for: Open to all.
- Admission: Free, register on the website.
- Book now
Add this event to my calendar
Click on "Create a calendar file" and your browser will download a .ics file for this event.
Microsoft Outlook: Download the file, double-click it to open it in Outlook, then click on "Save & Close" to save it to your calendar. If that doesn't work go into Outlook, click on the File tab, then on Open & Export, then Open Calendar. Select your .ics file then click on "Save & Close".
Google Calendar: download the file, then go into your calendar. On the left where it says "Other calendars" click on the arrow icon and then click on Import calendar. Click on Browse and select the .ics file, then click on Import.
Apple Calendar: The file may open automatically with an option to save it to your calendar. If not, download the file, then you can either drag it to Calendar or import the file by going to File >Import > Import and choosing the .ics file.
Fair and equitable treatment is a legal term of art well known in the field of overseas investment protection. It is also a rule of considerable practical importance in dispute settlement on the basis of investment treaties. Judging from publicly available awards, this is the obligation that investment treaty Tribunals are most likely to find to have been breached, often with very significant compensatory implications. However, despite its pedigree and importance, the textual formulation of ‘fair and equitable treatment’ in most treaties is not an example of excessive clarity regarding the legal criteria to be applied to resolving particular disputes. How should an interpreter, whether operating in an arbitral or a less formalised setting, approach the task of interpreting and applying the treaty rule on fair and equitable treatment? The talk will reflect upon the impact that recent developments in investment treaty-making (the 2015 EU-Vietnam FTA, the 2015 TPP, and the 2016 CETA) and investment arbitration have had on this issue.