Sociotechnical imaginaries of nuclear mobilisation in 1950s Britain
Add this event to my calendar
Click on "Create a calendar file" and your browser will download a .ics file for this event.
Microsoft Outlook: Download the file, double-click it to open it in Outlook, then click on "Save & Close" to save it to your calendar. If that doesn't work go into Outlook, click on the File tab, then on Open & Export, then Open Calendar. Select your .ics file then click on "Save & Close".
Google Calendar: download the file, then go into your calendar. On the left where it says "Other calendars" click on the arrow icon and then click on Import calendar. Click on Browse and select the .ics file, then click on Import.
Apple Calendar: The file may open automatically with an option to save it to your calendar. If not, download the file, then you can either drag it to Calendar or import the file by going to File >Import > Import and choosing the .ics file.
Recently, I was fortunate enough to be involved in an international research project (‘Danish Civil Defence: Fear and Survival During the Nuclear Age’, based at The University of Southern Denmark) that sought to interpret European nuclear civil defence activities via the concept of ‘sociotechnical imaginaries.’ Today, I will introduce the concept and talk about how it informed my own approach to a range of Civil Defence materials held at Wirral Archives.
The Open Access book which emerged from the project is Cronqvist, Farbøl and Sylvest (eds.), Cold War Civil Defence in Western Europe Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Survival and Preparedness (Palgrave, 2022). It is available for free here: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-84281-9
In my chapter I argued that the persistent social impact of nationwide sociotechnical imaginaries of nuclear weapons cannot be fully understood without considering the localized social, geographical and discursive contexts in which civil defence was located and enacted.
This talk will deconstruct the collaborative research process behind this new interpretation and discuss some of the problems we might face when attempting to read the archive through the lens of unfamiliar concepts.